<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Ning &#8211; WTF</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.sociosophy.com/2009/03/ning-wtf/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.sociosophy.com/2009/03/ning-wtf/</link>
	<description>Awesome Social Media Reviews, yay!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 17 Jan 2010 07:34:28 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: RON08</title>
		<link>http://www.sociosophy.com/2009/03/ning-wtf/comment-page-1/#comment-2489</link>
		<dc:creator>RON08</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 May 2009 15:31:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sociosophy.com/?p=750#comment-2489</guid>
		<description>I totally agree that if @Ning wants to make us her sub networks or goup-looking kind of networks, they should promote our individual networks the way YouTube does it, instead of the search box for the networks you want.  And on the Ning main page, it&#039;s only promoting 1 or 2 networks at a time.  I see favoritisms that way, which isn&#039;t appealing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I totally agree that if @Ning wants to make us her sub networks or goup-looking kind of networks, they should promote our individual networks the way YouTube does it, instead of the search box for the networks you want.  And on the Ning main page, it&#39;s only promoting 1 or 2 networks at a time.  I see favoritisms that way, which isn&#39;t appealing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
